Gaze doesn’t always lead steering

Esko Lehtonen, Otto Lappi, Noora Koskiahde, Tuomas Anttoni Mansikka, Jarkko Lauri Ilari Hietamäki, Kari Heikki Ilmari Summala

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

In car driving, gaze typically leads the steering when negotiating curves. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether drivers also use this gaze-leads-steering strategy when time-sharing between driving and a visual secondary task.

Fourteen participants drove an instrumented car along a motorway while performing a secondary task: looking at a specified visual target as long and as much as they felt it was safe to do so. They made six trips, and in each trip the target was at a different location relative to the road ahead. They were free to glance back at the road at any time. Gaze behaviour was measured with an eye tracker, and steering corrections were recorded from the vehicle’s CAN bus. Both in-car ‘Fixation’ targets and outside ‘Pursuit’ targets were used.

Drivers often used a gaze-leads-steering strategy, glancing at the road ahead 200–600 ms before executing steering corrections. However, when the targets were less eccentric (requiring a smaller change in glance direction relative to the road ahead), the reverse strategy, in which glances to the road ahead followed steering corrections with 0–400 ms latency, was clearly present. The observed use of strategies can be interpreted in terms of predictive processing: The gaze-leads-steering strategy is driven by the need to update the visual information and is therefore modulated by the quality/quantity of peripheral information. Implications for steering models are discussed.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiAccident Analysis and Prevention
Vuosikerta121
Sivut268-278
Sivumäärä11
ISSN0001-4575
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - joulukuuta 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 6162 Kognitiotiede

Lainaa tätä

Lehtonen, E., Lappi, O., Koskiahde, N., Mansikka, T. A., Hietamäki, J. L. I., & Summala, K. H. I. (2018). Gaze doesn’t always lead steering. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 121, 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026
Lehtonen, Esko ; Lappi, Otto ; Koskiahde, Noora ; Mansikka, Tuomas Anttoni ; Hietamäki, Jarkko Lauri Ilari ; Summala, Kari Heikki Ilmari. / Gaze doesn’t always lead steering. Julkaisussa: Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2018 ; Vuosikerta 121. Sivut 268-278.
@article{cc834e2b406c40e1a9f73a009bb9c1a5,
title = "Gaze doesn’t always lead steering",
abstract = "In car driving, gaze typically leads the steering when negotiating curves. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether drivers also use this gaze-leads-steering strategy when time-sharing between driving and a visual secondary task.Fourteen participants drove an instrumented car along a motorway while performing a secondary task: looking at a specified visual target as long and as much as they felt it was safe to do so. They made six trips, and in each trip the target was at a different location relative to the road ahead. They were free to glance back at the road at any time. Gaze behaviour was measured with an eye tracker, and steering corrections were recorded from the vehicle’s CAN bus. Both in-car ‘Fixation’ targets and outside ‘Pursuit’ targets were used.Drivers often used a gaze-leads-steering strategy, glancing at the road ahead 200–600 ms before executing steering corrections. However, when the targets were less eccentric (requiring a smaller change in glance direction relative to the road ahead), the reverse strategy, in which glances to the road ahead followed steering corrections with 0–400 ms latency, was clearly present. The observed use of strategies can be interpreted in terms of predictive processing: The gaze-leads-steering strategy is driven by the need to update the visual information and is therefore modulated by the quality/quantity of peripheral information. Implications for steering models are discussed.",
keywords = "6162 Cognitive science, eye tracking, driving, peripheral vision",
author = "Esko Lehtonen and Otto Lappi and Noora Koskiahde and Mansikka, {Tuomas Anttoni} and Hietam{\"a}ki, {Jarkko Lauri Ilari} and Summala, {Kari Heikki Ilmari}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "268--278",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co",

}

Lehtonen, E, Lappi, O, Koskiahde, N, Mansikka, TA, Hietamäki, JLI & Summala, KHI 2018, 'Gaze doesn’t always lead steering', Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vuosikerta 121, Sivut 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026

Gaze doesn’t always lead steering. / Lehtonen, Esko; Lappi, Otto; Koskiahde, Noora; Mansikka, Tuomas Anttoni; Hietamäki, Jarkko Lauri Ilari; Summala, Kari Heikki Ilmari.

julkaisussa: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vuosikerta 121, 12.2018, s. 268-278.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaze doesn’t always lead steering

AU - Lehtonen, Esko

AU - Lappi, Otto

AU - Koskiahde, Noora

AU - Mansikka, Tuomas Anttoni

AU - Hietamäki, Jarkko Lauri Ilari

AU - Summala, Kari Heikki Ilmari

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - In car driving, gaze typically leads the steering when negotiating curves. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether drivers also use this gaze-leads-steering strategy when time-sharing between driving and a visual secondary task.Fourteen participants drove an instrumented car along a motorway while performing a secondary task: looking at a specified visual target as long and as much as they felt it was safe to do so. They made six trips, and in each trip the target was at a different location relative to the road ahead. They were free to glance back at the road at any time. Gaze behaviour was measured with an eye tracker, and steering corrections were recorded from the vehicle’s CAN bus. Both in-car ‘Fixation’ targets and outside ‘Pursuit’ targets were used.Drivers often used a gaze-leads-steering strategy, glancing at the road ahead 200–600 ms before executing steering corrections. However, when the targets were less eccentric (requiring a smaller change in glance direction relative to the road ahead), the reverse strategy, in which glances to the road ahead followed steering corrections with 0–400 ms latency, was clearly present. The observed use of strategies can be interpreted in terms of predictive processing: The gaze-leads-steering strategy is driven by the need to update the visual information and is therefore modulated by the quality/quantity of peripheral information. Implications for steering models are discussed.

AB - In car driving, gaze typically leads the steering when negotiating curves. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether drivers also use this gaze-leads-steering strategy when time-sharing between driving and a visual secondary task.Fourteen participants drove an instrumented car along a motorway while performing a secondary task: looking at a specified visual target as long and as much as they felt it was safe to do so. They made six trips, and in each trip the target was at a different location relative to the road ahead. They were free to glance back at the road at any time. Gaze behaviour was measured with an eye tracker, and steering corrections were recorded from the vehicle’s CAN bus. Both in-car ‘Fixation’ targets and outside ‘Pursuit’ targets were used.Drivers often used a gaze-leads-steering strategy, glancing at the road ahead 200–600 ms before executing steering corrections. However, when the targets were less eccentric (requiring a smaller change in glance direction relative to the road ahead), the reverse strategy, in which glances to the road ahead followed steering corrections with 0–400 ms latency, was clearly present. The observed use of strategies can be interpreted in terms of predictive processing: The gaze-leads-steering strategy is driven by the need to update the visual information and is therefore modulated by the quality/quantity of peripheral information. Implications for steering models are discussed.

KW - 6162 Cognitive science

KW - eye tracking

KW - driving

KW - peripheral vision

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 268

EP - 278

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

ER -

Lehtonen E, Lappi O, Koskiahde N, Mansikka TA, Hietamäki JLI, Summala KHI. Gaze doesn’t always lead steering. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2018 joulu;121:268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026