TY - JOUR
T1 - Ideal vs. experienced
T2 - University teachers’ perceptions of a good university teacher and their experienced pedagogical competency
AU - Pekkarinen, Virve
AU - Hirsto, Laura
AU - Nevgi, Anne
PY - 2020/7/4
Y1 - 2020/7/4
N2 - This study explores how university teachers perceive the features and characteristics of a good university teacher and how they self-evaluate their experienced pedagogical competency. Furthermore, this study explores how the experienced pedagogical competency and perceived features and characteristics of a good university teacher are related. The data were collected by a questionnaire (N=73) from two groups of university teachers: the participants and non-participants of an educational development project. The results showed that the teachers perceived a good university teacher as having a wide knowledge base, having versatile professional roles, and continuously developing their professional competency. They also self-evaluated social reflection, emotions, and active participation in teaching development as core areas of their pedagogical competency. The university teachers' perceived ideal of a good university teacher was mainly consistent with their experienced pedagogical competency, however, an emotional aspect was not perceived to include the ideal of a good university teacher. Comparing the two groups revealed differences in how the university teachers experienced their expertise as teachers. It seems that strategic educational development projects can act as gateways todevelop teaching skills through systematic development of teaching for university teachers who may not find formal university pedagogy courses suitable for them.
AB - This study explores how university teachers perceive the features and characteristics of a good university teacher and how they self-evaluate their experienced pedagogical competency. Furthermore, this study explores how the experienced pedagogical competency and perceived features and characteristics of a good university teacher are related. The data were collected by a questionnaire (N=73) from two groups of university teachers: the participants and non-participants of an educational development project. The results showed that the teachers perceived a good university teacher as having a wide knowledge base, having versatile professional roles, and continuously developing their professional competency. They also self-evaluated social reflection, emotions, and active participation in teaching development as core areas of their pedagogical competency. The university teachers' perceived ideal of a good university teacher was mainly consistent with their experienced pedagogical competency, however, an emotional aspect was not perceived to include the ideal of a good university teacher. Comparing the two groups revealed differences in how the university teachers experienced their expertise as teachers. It seems that strategic educational development projects can act as gateways todevelop teaching skills through systematic development of teaching for university teachers who may not find formal university pedagogy courses suitable for them.
KW - 516 Educational sciences
M3 - Article
SN - 1812-9129
VL - 32
SP - 13
EP - 30
JO - International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
JF - International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
IS - 1
ER -