Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Mental Health Rehabilitation

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideology and communal approach—are realized in interactional practices associated with psychosocial rehabilitation. More spesifically, the paper discusses employee selection in the context of the Clubhouse-created Transitional Employment (TE) programme, which offers employment opportunities for rehabilitants. The paper describes how joint decisions are established during the moment-by-moment interactional processes at the Clubhouse. Drawing from the data set of 29 video-recorded rehabilitation group meetings, and Conversation Analysis as a method, the paper analyzes two questions: (1) How do the participants talk about the decision-making process associated with the TE on a “meta” level? And (2) how are the TE employees actually selected in the turn-by-turn sequential unfolding of interaction? When discussing the TE employee selection procedure on a “meta” level, the values of recovery ideology focusing on client empowerment and self-determination are prevalent. Also, the central ideals of the communal approach—openness and collaboration—are defended as decision-making guidelines. However, in the meetings where decisions on the TE employees are concretely made, there is a mismatch between the two ideological approaches to rehabilitation and the actual practices observable in the relevant interactional encounters.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiJournal of Psychosocial Rehabiliation and Mental Health
Vuosikerta6
Numero1
Sivut9-23
Sivumäärä15
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - kesäkuuta 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 5141 Sosiologia

Lainaa tätä

@article{e00eb483d98c43378b60dc33345b4223,
title = "Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Mental Health Rehabilitation",
abstract = "This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideology and communal approach—are realized in interactional practices associated with psychosocial rehabilitation. More spesifically, the paper discusses employee selection in the context of the Clubhouse-created Transitional Employment (TE) programme, which offers employment opportunities for rehabilitants. The paper describes how joint decisions are established during the moment-by-moment interactional processes at the Clubhouse. Drawing from the data set of 29 video-recorded rehabilitation group meetings, and Conversation Analysis as a method, the paper analyzes two questions: (1) How do the participants talk about the decision-making process associated with the TE on a “meta” level? And (2) how are the TE employees actually selected in the turn-by-turn sequential unfolding of interaction? When discussing the TE employee selection procedure on a “meta” level, the values of recovery ideology focusing on client empowerment and self-determination are prevalent. Also, the central ideals of the communal approach—openness and collaboration—are defended as decision-making guidelines. However, in the meetings where decisions on the TE employees are concretely made, there is a mismatch between the two ideological approaches to rehabilitation and the actual practices observable in the relevant interactional encounters.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, rehabilitation, professional ideology, joint decision-making, conversation analysis, social interaction",
author = "Valkeap{\"a}{\"a}, {Taina Jenni Marika} and Kimiko Tanaka and Lindholm, {Camilla Christina} and Weiste, {Elina Hannele} and Stevanovic, {Tuire Melisa}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "9--23",
journal = "Journal of Psychosocial Rehabiliation and Mental Health",
issn = "2198-9834",
publisher = "Springer India",
number = "1",

}

Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Mental Health Rehabilitation. / Valkeapää, Taina Jenni Marika; Tanaka, Kimiko ; Lindholm, Camilla Christina; Weiste, Elina Hannele; Stevanovic, Tuire Melisa.

julkaisussa: Journal of Psychosocial Rehabiliation and Mental Health, Vuosikerta 6, Nro 1, 06.2019, s. 9-23.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Mental Health Rehabilitation

AU - Valkeapää, Taina Jenni Marika

AU - Tanaka, Kimiko

AU - Lindholm, Camilla Christina

AU - Weiste, Elina Hannele

AU - Stevanovic, Tuire Melisa

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideology and communal approach—are realized in interactional practices associated with psychosocial rehabilitation. More spesifically, the paper discusses employee selection in the context of the Clubhouse-created Transitional Employment (TE) programme, which offers employment opportunities for rehabilitants. The paper describes how joint decisions are established during the moment-by-moment interactional processes at the Clubhouse. Drawing from the data set of 29 video-recorded rehabilitation group meetings, and Conversation Analysis as a method, the paper analyzes two questions: (1) How do the participants talk about the decision-making process associated with the TE on a “meta” level? And (2) how are the TE employees actually selected in the turn-by-turn sequential unfolding of interaction? When discussing the TE employee selection procedure on a “meta” level, the values of recovery ideology focusing on client empowerment and self-determination are prevalent. Also, the central ideals of the communal approach—openness and collaboration—are defended as decision-making guidelines. However, in the meetings where decisions on the TE employees are concretely made, there is a mismatch between the two ideological approaches to rehabilitation and the actual practices observable in the relevant interactional encounters.

AB - This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideology and communal approach—are realized in interactional practices associated with psychosocial rehabilitation. More spesifically, the paper discusses employee selection in the context of the Clubhouse-created Transitional Employment (TE) programme, which offers employment opportunities for rehabilitants. The paper describes how joint decisions are established during the moment-by-moment interactional processes at the Clubhouse. Drawing from the data set of 29 video-recorded rehabilitation group meetings, and Conversation Analysis as a method, the paper analyzes two questions: (1) How do the participants talk about the decision-making process associated with the TE on a “meta” level? And (2) how are the TE employees actually selected in the turn-by-turn sequential unfolding of interaction? When discussing the TE employee selection procedure on a “meta” level, the values of recovery ideology focusing on client empowerment and self-determination are prevalent. Also, the central ideals of the communal approach—openness and collaboration—are defended as decision-making guidelines. However, in the meetings where decisions on the TE employees are concretely made, there is a mismatch between the two ideological approaches to rehabilitation and the actual practices observable in the relevant interactional encounters.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - rehabilitation

KW - professional ideology

KW - joint decision-making

KW - conversation analysis

KW - social interaction

U2 - 10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3

DO - 10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 9

EP - 23

JO - Journal of Psychosocial Rehabiliation and Mental Health

JF - Journal of Psychosocial Rehabiliation and Mental Health

SN - 2198-9834

IS - 1

ER -