Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles? Some Bridge-Building Between Philosophical and Theological Positions

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

Many different reasons against belief in divine action, particularly miracles have been presented. However, arguments based on classical deterministic physics are perhaps the most popular. In the theology and science literature, this argument has been challenged primarily by challenging the determinism of physics based on new scientific discoveries. However, recent philosophical and theological discussion has instead focused on criticizing the philosophical and theological premises of the argument from classical science against miracles. The purpose of this article is to explore these new arguments and build bridges between the theology and science community and analytic philosophers of religion following Alvin Plantinga and William Alston.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
OtsikkoGod's Providence and Randomness in Nature : Scientific and Theological Perspectives
ToimittajatRobert John Russell, Joshua M. Moritz
Sivumäärä27
JulkaisupaikkaWest Conshohocken
KustantajaTempleton Press
Julkaisupäivä2019
ISBN (painettu)978-1-59947-567-7
ISBN (elektroninen)978-1-59947-568-4
TilaJulkaistu - 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa

Tieteenalat

  • 614 Teologia

Siteeraa tätä

Kojonen, E. V. R. (2019). Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles? Some Bridge-Building Between Philosophical and Theological Positions. teoksessa R. J. Russell, & J. M. Moritz (Toimittajat), God's Providence and Randomness in Nature: Scientific and Theological Perspectives Templeton Press.