Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles? Some Bridge-Building Between Different Positions

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Many different reasons against belief in divine action, particularly miracles have been presented. However, arguments based on classical deterministic physics are perhaps the most popular. In the theology and science literature, this argument has been challenged primarily by challenging the determinism of physics based on new scientific discoveries. However, recent philosophical and theological discussion has instead focused on criticizing the philosophical and theological premises of the argument from classical science against miracles. The purpose of this article is to explore these new arguments and build bridges between the theology and science community and analytic philosophers of religion following Alvin Plantinga and William Alston.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
OtsikkoSATURN conference proceedings
ToimittajatRobert Russell
Sivumäärä27
Julkaisupäivä2018
TilaHyväksytty/In press - 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa

Tieteenalat

  • 614 Teologia

Lainaa tätä

Kojonen, E. V. R. (Hyväksytty/painossa). Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles? Some Bridge-Building Between Different Positions. teoksessa R. Russell (Toimittaja), SATURN conference proceedings
@inbook{d7a0fb9065e641e4b5a9d3a5bd9a0117,
title = "Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles?: Some Bridge-Building Between Different Positions",
abstract = "Many different reasons against belief in divine action, particularly miracles have been presented. However, arguments based on classical deterministic physics are perhaps the most popular. In the theology and science literature, this argument has been challenged primarily by challenging the determinism of physics based on new scientific discoveries. However, recent philosophical and theological discussion has instead focused on criticizing the philosophical and theological premises of the argument from classical science against miracles. The purpose of this article is to explore these new arguments and build bridges between the theology and science community and analytic philosophers of religion following Alvin Plantinga and William Alston.",
keywords = "614 Theology",
author = "Kojonen, {Erkki Vesa Rope}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
editor = "Robert Russell",
booktitle = "SATURN conference proceedings",

}

Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles? Some Bridge-Building Between Different Positions. / Kojonen, Erkki Vesa Rope.

SATURN conference proceedings. toim. / Robert Russell. 2018.

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - CHAP

T1 - Is Classical Science in Conflict with Belief in Miracles?

T2 - Some Bridge-Building Between Different Positions

AU - Kojonen, Erkki Vesa Rope

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Many different reasons against belief in divine action, particularly miracles have been presented. However, arguments based on classical deterministic physics are perhaps the most popular. In the theology and science literature, this argument has been challenged primarily by challenging the determinism of physics based on new scientific discoveries. However, recent philosophical and theological discussion has instead focused on criticizing the philosophical and theological premises of the argument from classical science against miracles. The purpose of this article is to explore these new arguments and build bridges between the theology and science community and analytic philosophers of religion following Alvin Plantinga and William Alston.

AB - Many different reasons against belief in divine action, particularly miracles have been presented. However, arguments based on classical deterministic physics are perhaps the most popular. In the theology and science literature, this argument has been challenged primarily by challenging the determinism of physics based on new scientific discoveries. However, recent philosophical and theological discussion has instead focused on criticizing the philosophical and theological premises of the argument from classical science against miracles. The purpose of this article is to explore these new arguments and build bridges between the theology and science community and analytic philosophers of religion following Alvin Plantinga and William Alston.

KW - 614 Theology

M3 - Chapter

BT - SATURN conference proceedings

A2 - Russell, Robert

ER -