Multiple socioeconomic circumstances and trajectories of fruit and vegetable consumption: the Helsinki Health Study

Aims: Fruit and vegetable consumption is essential in disease prevention. Socioeconomic differences in consumption have been observed but evidence from longitudinal studies incorporating multiple socioeconomic indicators is lacking. We examined long-term fruit and vegetable consumption trajectories and multiple socioeconomic circumstances as their determinants.

Methods: We used survey data from the Helsinki Health Study (phase 1 in 2000-2002, N=8960, response rate 67%; phases 2-4 in 2007, 2012 and 2017) among initially 40- to 60-year-old employees of City of Helsinki, Finland. Fruit and vegetable consumption was measured by a food frequency questionnaire and consumption times per month were calculated. Childhood (parental education, economic difficulties), conventional (own education, occupational class, household income) and material (housing tenure, wealth, current economic difficulties) socioeconomic circumstances were included. We used group-based trajectory modelling for identifying fruit and vegetable consumption trajectories and multinomial logistic regression for examining associations between socioeconomic circumstances and the trajectories.

Results: Four fruit and vegetable consumption trajectories were identified: increasing higher (12%), decreasing higher (10%), stable moderate (43%) and stable low (35% of participants). Childhood, conventional and material socioeconomic circumstances were all associated with the trajectories: belonging to a lower socioeconomic group was associated with belonging to the stable low and moderate trajectories. In multivariate models, the strongest associations were found for occupational class and household wealth.

Conclusions: Disadvantageous childhood and adulthood socioeconomic circumstances were associated with lower long-term fruit and vegetable consumption. Socioeconomic circumstances should be considered in attempts to promote fruit and vegetable consumption, and people with disadvantageous circumstances need to be targeted in future interventions.