Paradoxes of Agency: Democracy and Welfare in Russia

Meri Kulmala, Markus Johannes Kainu, Jouko Nikula, Markku Kivinen

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

While Russia’s leaders claim to have facilitated a “miracle” in welfare provision, an examination of the budget numbers shows that overall welfare spending has not increased as much as general budget outlays. Because there is little room for NGO or trade union involvement in decision-making, policies support state interests rather than those of the broader society. For example, Russian leaders have concentrated resources on raising the birthrate and increasing pensions rather than addressing the pressing issue of high male mortality. Paradoxically, however, in some cases, NGOs initiate the provision of new kinds of services, such as for AIDS patients, which are then taken over by the state. Federalism is important since there is wide variation across regions in social welfare provision. Ultimately, Russia’s welfare policies are neither purely statist nor neo-liberal since the state is expanding its role in some areas, while shedding responsibilities in others.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiDemokratizatsiya
Vuosikerta22
Numero4
Sivut523-552
Sivumäärä30
ISSN1074-6846
TilaJulkaistu - 23 lokakuuta 2014
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 5142 Sosiaali- ja yhteiskuntapolitiikka

Lainaa tätä

Kulmala, Meri ; Kainu, Markus Johannes ; Nikula, Jouko ; Kivinen, Markku. / Paradoxes of Agency: Democracy and Welfare in Russia. Julkaisussa: Demokratizatsiya. 2014 ; Vuosikerta 22, Nro 4. Sivut 523-552.
@article{7349c2afe7b64c4b8ab3c9c6f7108b47,
title = "Paradoxes of Agency: Democracy and Welfare in Russia",
abstract = "While Russia’s leaders claim to have facilitated a “miracle” in welfare provision, an examination of the budget numbers shows that overall welfare spending has not increased as much as general budget outlays. Because there is little room for NGO or trade union involvement in decision-making, policies support state interests rather than those of the broader society. For example, Russian leaders have concentrated resources on raising the birthrate and increasing pensions rather than addressing the pressing issue of high male mortality. Paradoxically, however, in some cases, NGOs initiate the provision of new kinds of services, such as for AIDS patients, which are then taken over by the state. Federalism is important since there is wide variation across regions in social welfare provision. Ultimately, Russia’s welfare policies are neither purely statist nor neo-liberal since the state is expanding its role in some areas, while shedding responsibilities in others.",
keywords = "5142 Social policy, Russia, Welfare, Agency",
author = "Meri Kulmala and Kainu, {Markus Johannes} and Jouko Nikula and Markku Kivinen",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "23",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "523--552",
journal = "Demokratizatsiya",
issn = "1074-6846",
publisher = "World Affairs Institute",
number = "4",

}

Paradoxes of Agency: Democracy and Welfare in Russia. / Kulmala, Meri; Kainu, Markus Johannes; Nikula, Jouko; Kivinen, Markku.

julkaisussa: Demokratizatsiya, Vuosikerta 22, Nro 4, 23.10.2014, s. 523-552.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradoxes of Agency: Democracy and Welfare in Russia

AU - Kulmala, Meri

AU - Kainu, Markus Johannes

AU - Nikula, Jouko

AU - Kivinen, Markku

PY - 2014/10/23

Y1 - 2014/10/23

N2 - While Russia’s leaders claim to have facilitated a “miracle” in welfare provision, an examination of the budget numbers shows that overall welfare spending has not increased as much as general budget outlays. Because there is little room for NGO or trade union involvement in decision-making, policies support state interests rather than those of the broader society. For example, Russian leaders have concentrated resources on raising the birthrate and increasing pensions rather than addressing the pressing issue of high male mortality. Paradoxically, however, in some cases, NGOs initiate the provision of new kinds of services, such as for AIDS patients, which are then taken over by the state. Federalism is important since there is wide variation across regions in social welfare provision. Ultimately, Russia’s welfare policies are neither purely statist nor neo-liberal since the state is expanding its role in some areas, while shedding responsibilities in others.

AB - While Russia’s leaders claim to have facilitated a “miracle” in welfare provision, an examination of the budget numbers shows that overall welfare spending has not increased as much as general budget outlays. Because there is little room for NGO or trade union involvement in decision-making, policies support state interests rather than those of the broader society. For example, Russian leaders have concentrated resources on raising the birthrate and increasing pensions rather than addressing the pressing issue of high male mortality. Paradoxically, however, in some cases, NGOs initiate the provision of new kinds of services, such as for AIDS patients, which are then taken over by the state. Federalism is important since there is wide variation across regions in social welfare provision. Ultimately, Russia’s welfare policies are neither purely statist nor neo-liberal since the state is expanding its role in some areas, while shedding responsibilities in others.

KW - 5142 Social policy

KW - Russia

KW - Welfare

KW - Agency

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 523

EP - 552

JO - Demokratizatsiya

JF - Demokratizatsiya

SN - 1074-6846

IS - 4

ER -