Predicting response to interpersonal counselling (IPC) from case formulation: A systematic comparison between recovered and unchanged depressive cases

Jarmo Kontunen, Elina Hannele Weiste, Timo Liukkonen, Markku Timonen, Jukka Aaltonen

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

We sought to explore how the process between the counsellor and
patient for arriving at a case formulation may predict the outcome of
manualized interpersonal counselling (IPC) for depression in primary
care. Qualitative content analysis and applied conversation analysis
(CA) were used to achieve depth in the understanding of case
formulation process among five patients who recovered and five
who were unchanged according to quantitative post-treatment
change rates derived from Clinical Outcomes in Routine
Evaluation– Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Interaction in the case
formulations for the recovered group was generally characterized by
ajoint construction effort between the counsellor and the patient
centred on one problem area. The ability to delimit problems to one
area was associated with the patient’s role disputes in social relationships.
For the unchanged patients, the case formulation typically
reflected unilateral construction of the problem area, and more
than one problem area was selected as the focus. The problem
areas in the unchanged group were associated with complicated
grief or loneliness. The process between counsellor and patient of
arriving at and agreeing on acase formulation might potentially
contribute to recovery, and it deserves greater attention in training
counsellors and conducting research.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiCounselling Psychology Quarterly
ISSN0951-5070
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaE-pub ahead of print - 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 515 Psykologia
  • Interpersonal counselling
  • primary care
  • depression
  • 5141 Sosiologia
  • conversation analysis

Lainaa tätä

@article{611bee5fc5f54c56bc83c655d627d50d,
title = "Predicting response to interpersonal counselling (IPC) from case formulation: A systematic comparison between recovered and unchanged depressive cases",
abstract = "We sought to explore how the process between the counsellor andpatient for arriving at a case formulation may predict the outcome ofmanualized interpersonal counselling (IPC) for depression in primarycare. Qualitative content analysis and applied conversation analysis(CA) were used to achieve depth in the understanding of caseformulation process among five patients who recovered and fivewho were unchanged according to quantitative post-treatmentchange rates derived from Clinical Outcomes in RoutineEvaluation– Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Interaction in the caseformulations for the recovered group was generally characterized byajoint construction effort between the counsellor and the patientcentred on one problem area. The ability to delimit problems to onearea was associated with the patient’s role disputes in social relationships.For the unchanged patients, the case formulation typicallyreflected unilateral construction of the problem area, and morethan one problem area was selected as the focus. The problemareas in the unchanged group were associated with complicatedgrief or loneliness. The process between counsellor and patient ofarriving at and agreeing on acase formulation might potentiallycontribute to recovery, and it deserves greater attention in trainingcounsellors and conducting research.",
keywords = "515 Psychology, Interpersonal counselling, primary care, depression, 5141 Sociology, conversation analysis",
author = "Jarmo Kontunen and Weiste, {Elina Hannele} and Timo Liukkonen and Markku Timonen and Jukka Aaltonen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/09515070.2019.1588101",
language = "English",
journal = "Counselling Psychology Quarterly",
issn = "0951-5070",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Predicting response to interpersonal counselling (IPC) from case formulation : A systematic comparison between recovered and unchanged depressive cases. / Kontunen, Jarmo; Weiste, Elina Hannele; Liukkonen, Timo; Timonen, Markku; Aaltonen, Jukka.

julkaisussa: Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 2019.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting response to interpersonal counselling (IPC) from case formulation

T2 - A systematic comparison between recovered and unchanged depressive cases

AU - Kontunen, Jarmo

AU - Weiste, Elina Hannele

AU - Liukkonen, Timo

AU - Timonen, Markku

AU - Aaltonen, Jukka

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We sought to explore how the process between the counsellor andpatient for arriving at a case formulation may predict the outcome ofmanualized interpersonal counselling (IPC) for depression in primarycare. Qualitative content analysis and applied conversation analysis(CA) were used to achieve depth in the understanding of caseformulation process among five patients who recovered and fivewho were unchanged according to quantitative post-treatmentchange rates derived from Clinical Outcomes in RoutineEvaluation– Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Interaction in the caseformulations for the recovered group was generally characterized byajoint construction effort between the counsellor and the patientcentred on one problem area. The ability to delimit problems to onearea was associated with the patient’s role disputes in social relationships.For the unchanged patients, the case formulation typicallyreflected unilateral construction of the problem area, and morethan one problem area was selected as the focus. The problemareas in the unchanged group were associated with complicatedgrief or loneliness. The process between counsellor and patient ofarriving at and agreeing on acase formulation might potentiallycontribute to recovery, and it deserves greater attention in trainingcounsellors and conducting research.

AB - We sought to explore how the process between the counsellor andpatient for arriving at a case formulation may predict the outcome ofmanualized interpersonal counselling (IPC) for depression in primarycare. Qualitative content analysis and applied conversation analysis(CA) were used to achieve depth in the understanding of caseformulation process among five patients who recovered and fivewho were unchanged according to quantitative post-treatmentchange rates derived from Clinical Outcomes in RoutineEvaluation– Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Interaction in the caseformulations for the recovered group was generally characterized byajoint construction effort between the counsellor and the patientcentred on one problem area. The ability to delimit problems to onearea was associated with the patient’s role disputes in social relationships.For the unchanged patients, the case formulation typicallyreflected unilateral construction of the problem area, and morethan one problem area was selected as the focus. The problemareas in the unchanged group were associated with complicatedgrief or loneliness. The process between counsellor and patient ofarriving at and agreeing on acase formulation might potentiallycontribute to recovery, and it deserves greater attention in trainingcounsellors and conducting research.

KW - 515 Psychology

KW - Interpersonal counselling

KW - primary care

KW - depression

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - conversation analysis

U2 - 10.1080/09515070.2019.1588101

DO - 10.1080/09515070.2019.1588101

M3 - Article

JO - Counselling Psychology Quarterly

JF - Counselling Psychology Quarterly

SN - 0951-5070

ER -