Susann Wagenknecht’s "'Facing the Incompleteness of epistemic trust' - A Critical Reply"

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinen

Kuvaus

In this response paper I aim to do three things. First, I wish to clarify the claim that epistemic trust is incomplete and I suggest that there is one dimension to the incompleteness not mentioned by Wagenknecht. Second, I argue that moral trust can play an important role in managing epistemic dependency under conditions of incomplete epistemic trust. By moral trust I mean trust in the moral character of the testifier. Finally, I raise some questions for future research.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiSocial Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Vuosikerta3
Numero5
Sivut74-78
Sivumäärä5
ISSN2471-9560
TilaJulkaistu - 25 huhtikuuta 2014
OKM-julkaisutyyppiB1 Kirjoitus tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Tieteenalat

  • 611 Filosofia

Lainaa tätä

@article{b10d086768664fe69a55f84f71095e6f,
title = "Susann Wagenknecht’s {"}'Facing the Incompleteness of epistemic trust' - A Critical Reply{"}",
abstract = "In this response paper I aim to do three things. First, I wish to clarify the claim that epistemic trust is incomplete and I suggest that there is one dimension to the incompleteness not mentioned by Wagenknecht. Second, I argue that moral trust can play an important role in managing epistemic dependency under conditions of incomplete epistemic trust. By moral trust I mean trust in the moral character of the testifier. Finally, I raise some questions for future research.",
keywords = "611 Philosophy, Scientific collaboration, Epistemic trust",
author = "Rolin, {Kristina Helena}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "25",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "74--78",
journal = "Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective",
issn = "2471-9560",
publisher = "Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective",
number = "5",

}

Susann Wagenknecht’s "'Facing the Incompleteness of epistemic trust' - A Critical Reply". / Rolin, Kristina Helena.

julkaisussa: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective , Vuosikerta 3, Nro 5, 25.04.2014, s. 74-78.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinen

TY - JOUR

T1 - Susann Wagenknecht’s "'Facing the Incompleteness of epistemic trust' - A Critical Reply"

AU - Rolin, Kristina Helena

PY - 2014/4/25

Y1 - 2014/4/25

N2 - In this response paper I aim to do three things. First, I wish to clarify the claim that epistemic trust is incomplete and I suggest that there is one dimension to the incompleteness not mentioned by Wagenknecht. Second, I argue that moral trust can play an important role in managing epistemic dependency under conditions of incomplete epistemic trust. By moral trust I mean trust in the moral character of the testifier. Finally, I raise some questions for future research.

AB - In this response paper I aim to do three things. First, I wish to clarify the claim that epistemic trust is incomplete and I suggest that there is one dimension to the incompleteness not mentioned by Wagenknecht. Second, I argue that moral trust can play an important role in managing epistemic dependency under conditions of incomplete epistemic trust. By moral trust I mean trust in the moral character of the testifier. Finally, I raise some questions for future research.

KW - 611 Philosophy

KW - Scientific collaboration

KW - Epistemic trust

UR - http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-1qU

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 74

EP - 78

JO - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

JF - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

SN - 2471-9560

IS - 5

ER -