The case of conflicting Finnish peatland management – Skewed representation of nature, participation and policy instruments

Anna Salomaa, Riikka Paloniemi, Ari Ekroos

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Peatlands that are close to a natural state are rich in biodiversity and are significant carbon storages. Simultaneously, peat resources are of interest to industry, which leads to competing interests and tensions regarding the use and management of peatlands. In this case study, we studied knowledge-management interactions through the development of participation and the resulting representation of nature (how nature was described), as well as the proposed and implemented conservation policy instruments. We focused on the years 2009-2015, when peatland management was intensively debated in Finland. We did an interpretative policy analysis using policy documents (Peatland Strategy; Government Resolution; Proposal for Conservation Programme) and environmental legislation as central data. Our results show how the representation of nature reflected the purpose of the documents and consensus of participants' values. The representation of nature changed from skewed use of ecosystem services to detailed ecological knowledge. However, simultaneously, political power changed and the planned supplementation programme for peatland conservation was not implemented. The Environment Protection Act was reformulated so that it prohibited the use of the most valuable peatlands. Landowners did not have the chance to fully participate in the policy process. Overall, the conservation policy instruments changed to emphasize voluntariness but without an adequate budget to ensure sufficient conservation.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiJournal of Environmental Management
Vuosikerta223
Numero1
Sivut694-702
Sivumäärä9
ISSN0301-4797
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 1 lokakuuta 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 1172 Ympäristötiede

Lainaa tätä

@article{4f2f23b53f4545b5b3dbd15862d807d6,
title = "The case of conflicting Finnish peatland management – Skewed representation of nature, participation and policy instruments",
abstract = "Peatlands that are close to a natural state are rich in biodiversity and are significant carbon storages. Simultaneously, peat resources are of interest to industry, which leads to competing interests and tensions regarding the use and management of peatlands. In this case study, we studied knowledge-management interactions through the development of participation and the resulting representation of nature (how nature was described), as well as the proposed and implemented conservation policy instruments. We focused on the years 2009-2015, when peatland management was intensively debated in Finland. We did an interpretative policy analysis using policy documents (Peatland Strategy; Government Resolution; Proposal for Conservation Programme) and environmental legislation as central data. Our results show how the representation of nature reflected the purpose of the documents and consensus of participants' values. The representation of nature changed from skewed use of ecosystem services to detailed ecological knowledge. However, simultaneously, political power changed and the planned supplementation programme for peatland conservation was not implemented. The Environment Protection Act was reformulated so that it prohibited the use of the most valuable peatlands. Landowners did not have the chance to fully participate in the policy process. Overall, the conservation policy instruments changed to emphasize voluntariness but without an adequate budget to ensure sufficient conservation.",
keywords = "1172 Environmental sciences, Land use, Natural resources, Participation, Peat, Policy, Sustainable use, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, CONSERVATION, PROTECTION, KNOWLEDGE, ECOLOGY, SCIENCE",
author = "Anna Salomaa and Riikka Paloniemi and Ari Ekroos",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.048",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
pages = "694--702",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "1",

}

The case of conflicting Finnish peatland management – Skewed representation of nature, participation and policy instruments. / Salomaa, Anna; Paloniemi, Riikka; Ekroos, Ari.

julkaisussa: Journal of Environmental Management, Vuosikerta 223, Nro 1, 01.10.2018, s. 694-702.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case of conflicting Finnish peatland management – Skewed representation of nature, participation and policy instruments

AU - Salomaa, Anna

AU - Paloniemi, Riikka

AU - Ekroos, Ari

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Peatlands that are close to a natural state are rich in biodiversity and are significant carbon storages. Simultaneously, peat resources are of interest to industry, which leads to competing interests and tensions regarding the use and management of peatlands. In this case study, we studied knowledge-management interactions through the development of participation and the resulting representation of nature (how nature was described), as well as the proposed and implemented conservation policy instruments. We focused on the years 2009-2015, when peatland management was intensively debated in Finland. We did an interpretative policy analysis using policy documents (Peatland Strategy; Government Resolution; Proposal for Conservation Programme) and environmental legislation as central data. Our results show how the representation of nature reflected the purpose of the documents and consensus of participants' values. The representation of nature changed from skewed use of ecosystem services to detailed ecological knowledge. However, simultaneously, political power changed and the planned supplementation programme for peatland conservation was not implemented. The Environment Protection Act was reformulated so that it prohibited the use of the most valuable peatlands. Landowners did not have the chance to fully participate in the policy process. Overall, the conservation policy instruments changed to emphasize voluntariness but without an adequate budget to ensure sufficient conservation.

AB - Peatlands that are close to a natural state are rich in biodiversity and are significant carbon storages. Simultaneously, peat resources are of interest to industry, which leads to competing interests and tensions regarding the use and management of peatlands. In this case study, we studied knowledge-management interactions through the development of participation and the resulting representation of nature (how nature was described), as well as the proposed and implemented conservation policy instruments. We focused on the years 2009-2015, when peatland management was intensively debated in Finland. We did an interpretative policy analysis using policy documents (Peatland Strategy; Government Resolution; Proposal for Conservation Programme) and environmental legislation as central data. Our results show how the representation of nature reflected the purpose of the documents and consensus of participants' values. The representation of nature changed from skewed use of ecosystem services to detailed ecological knowledge. However, simultaneously, political power changed and the planned supplementation programme for peatland conservation was not implemented. The Environment Protection Act was reformulated so that it prohibited the use of the most valuable peatlands. Landowners did not have the chance to fully participate in the policy process. Overall, the conservation policy instruments changed to emphasize voluntariness but without an adequate budget to ensure sufficient conservation.

KW - 1172 Environmental sciences

KW - Land use

KW - Natural resources

KW - Participation

KW - Peat

KW - Policy

KW - Sustainable use

KW - ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

KW - CONSERVATION

KW - PROTECTION

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - ECOLOGY

KW - SCIENCE

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.048

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.048

M3 - Article

VL - 223

SP - 694

EP - 702

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

IS - 1

ER -