The politic social work in small local government of Estonia: The configuration between the structural power and the performance of the social services “

Vaike Raudava

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKonferenssiartikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

For the function-based organization view, the local government has the hierarchical structure, together with the representative body and the executive body (political and administrative) in Estonia. According to Bartol and Martin (1994), the organisational structures are typically created by management for specific purposes (Senior 2002).

The aim of the research has been to find answers to the question, ‘how does the system of administering personal social services function in small Estonian governments”. Utilizing the collective case study, I followed the information-oriented selection: maximum variation cases for the size and location (Luck, Jackson and Usher 2006).

The results represent the four units of the framework of social welfare administration: 1) the political leadership, 2) the political co-operation, 3) the specialist or non-professional and 4) the political-administrative unit (the Ministry of Social Affairs). The responsibility is shared between administrative and political units and framework of administration is involving the non-professionals, who are professionals in another field or the about non-educated members.

The main problem is carried out at the practice of the framework of the administration of social welfare. This practice, where people from the street are directly related to client work, having decision making rights on issues concerning the client; then, it will be regarded as historic, the principle of collegial decision-making continuing in the 21st century.

The function of the decision`s process follows the principle of collegial decision-making and unfortunately, I argue, that the decision process at the client level is politicised. The decision-making process regarding the clients is distributed among different levels, the practice undermines the independence of the social worker, and the social worker cannot protect the rights of the client. Most important, the principle of collective responsibility lives on in the 21st century without giving the profession of social work the opportunity to grow independently in Estonia.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
OtsikkoUnknown host publication
Julkaisupäivä2015
TilaJulkaistu - 2015
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisuussa
TapahtumaEuropean Conference for Social Work Research - Ljubljana, Slovenia
Kesto: 22 huhtikuuta 201524 huhtikuuta 2015
Konferenssinumero: 5 (ECSWR)

Tieteenalat

  • 5145 Sosiaalityö

Lainaa tätä

@inproceedings{8ed0c16608af433aade1aff580ae5844,
title = "The politic social work in small local government of Estonia: The configuration between the structural power and the performance of the social services “",
abstract = "For the function-based organization view, the local government has the hierarchical structure, together with the representative body and the executive body (political and administrative) in Estonia. According to Bartol and Martin (1994), the organisational structures are typically created by management for specific purposes (Senior 2002).The aim of the research has been to find answers to the question, ‘how does the system of administering personal social services function in small Estonian governments”. Utilizing the collective case study, I followed the information-oriented selection: maximum variation cases for the size and location (Luck, Jackson and Usher 2006). The results represent the four units of the framework of social welfare administration: 1) the political leadership, 2) the political co-operation, 3) the specialist or non-professional and 4) the political-administrative unit (the Ministry of Social Affairs). The responsibility is shared between administrative and political units and framework of administration is involving the non-professionals, who are professionals in another field or the about non-educated members. The main problem is carried out at the practice of the framework of the administration of social welfare. This practice, where people from the street are directly related to client work, having decision making rights on issues concerning the client; then, it will be regarded as historic, the principle of collegial decision-making continuing in the 21st century. The function of the decision`s process follows the principle of collegial decision-making and unfortunately, I argue, that the decision process at the client level is politicised. The decision-making process regarding the clients is distributed among different levels, the practice undermines the independence of the social worker, and the social worker cannot protect the rights of the client. Most important, the principle of collective responsibility lives on in the 21st century without giving the profession of social work the opportunity to grow independently in Estonia.",
keywords = "5145 Social work, social work administration",
author = "Vaike Raudava",
note = "Volume: Proceeding volume:",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Unknown host publication",

}

Raudava, V 2015, The politic social work in small local government of Estonia: The configuration between the structural power and the performance of the social services “. julkaisussa Unknown host publication. European Conference for Social Work Research, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 22/04/2015.

The politic social work in small local government of Estonia: The configuration between the structural power and the performance of the social services “. / Raudava, Vaike.

Unknown host publication. 2015.

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKonferenssiartikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - GEN

T1 - The politic social work in small local government of Estonia: The configuration between the structural power and the performance of the social services “

AU - Raudava, Vaike

N1 - Volume: Proceeding volume:

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - For the function-based organization view, the local government has the hierarchical structure, together with the representative body and the executive body (political and administrative) in Estonia. According to Bartol and Martin (1994), the organisational structures are typically created by management for specific purposes (Senior 2002).The aim of the research has been to find answers to the question, ‘how does the system of administering personal social services function in small Estonian governments”. Utilizing the collective case study, I followed the information-oriented selection: maximum variation cases for the size and location (Luck, Jackson and Usher 2006). The results represent the four units of the framework of social welfare administration: 1) the political leadership, 2) the political co-operation, 3) the specialist or non-professional and 4) the political-administrative unit (the Ministry of Social Affairs). The responsibility is shared between administrative and political units and framework of administration is involving the non-professionals, who are professionals in another field or the about non-educated members. The main problem is carried out at the practice of the framework of the administration of social welfare. This practice, where people from the street are directly related to client work, having decision making rights on issues concerning the client; then, it will be regarded as historic, the principle of collegial decision-making continuing in the 21st century. The function of the decision`s process follows the principle of collegial decision-making and unfortunately, I argue, that the decision process at the client level is politicised. The decision-making process regarding the clients is distributed among different levels, the practice undermines the independence of the social worker, and the social worker cannot protect the rights of the client. Most important, the principle of collective responsibility lives on in the 21st century without giving the profession of social work the opportunity to grow independently in Estonia.

AB - For the function-based organization view, the local government has the hierarchical structure, together with the representative body and the executive body (political and administrative) in Estonia. According to Bartol and Martin (1994), the organisational structures are typically created by management for specific purposes (Senior 2002).The aim of the research has been to find answers to the question, ‘how does the system of administering personal social services function in small Estonian governments”. Utilizing the collective case study, I followed the information-oriented selection: maximum variation cases for the size and location (Luck, Jackson and Usher 2006). The results represent the four units of the framework of social welfare administration: 1) the political leadership, 2) the political co-operation, 3) the specialist or non-professional and 4) the political-administrative unit (the Ministry of Social Affairs). The responsibility is shared between administrative and political units and framework of administration is involving the non-professionals, who are professionals in another field or the about non-educated members. The main problem is carried out at the practice of the framework of the administration of social welfare. This practice, where people from the street are directly related to client work, having decision making rights on issues concerning the client; then, it will be regarded as historic, the principle of collegial decision-making continuing in the 21st century. The function of the decision`s process follows the principle of collegial decision-making and unfortunately, I argue, that the decision process at the client level is politicised. The decision-making process regarding the clients is distributed among different levels, the practice undermines the independence of the social worker, and the social worker cannot protect the rights of the client. Most important, the principle of collective responsibility lives on in the 21st century without giving the profession of social work the opportunity to grow independently in Estonia.

KW - 5145 Social work

KW - social work administration

UR - http://indosow.info/exordo2/book1.pdf

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Unknown host publication

ER -