Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe

Health-related and sociodemographic determinants

Laura M. Kemppainen, Teemu T. Kemppainen, Jutta A. Reippainen, Suvi T. Salmenniemi, Pia Vuolanto

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Aims: The aim of this research was to study health-related and sociodemographic determinants of the use of different complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments in Europe and differences in CAM use in various European countries. Methods: The study was based on a design-based logistic regression analysis of the European Social Survey (ESS), Round 7. We distinguished four CAM modalities: manual therapies, alternative medicinal systems, traditional Asian medical systems and mind-body therapies. Results: In total, 25.9% of the general population had used CAM during the last 12 months. Typically, only one CAM treatment had been used, and it was used more often as complementary rather than alternative treatment. The use of CAM varied greatly by country, from 10% in Hungary to almost 40% in Germany. Compared to those in good health, the use of CAM was two to fourfold greater among those with health problems. The health profiles of users of different CAM modalities varied. For example, back or neck pain was associated with all types of CAM, whereas depression was associated only with the use of mind-body therapies. Individuals with difficult to diagnose health conditions were more inclined to utilize CAM, and CAM use was more common among women and those with a higher education. Lower income was associated with the use of mind-body therapies, whereas the other three CAM modalities were associated with higher income. Conclusions: Help-seeking differed according to the health problem, something that should be acknowledged by clinical professionals to ensure safe care. The findings also point towards possible socioeconomic inequalities in health service use.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiScandinavian Journal of Public Health
Vuosikerta46
Numero4
Sivut448-455
Sivumäärä8
ISSN1403-4948
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 1 kesäkuuta 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 5141 Sosiologia

Lainaa tätä

Kemppainen, Laura M. ; Kemppainen, Teemu T. ; Reippainen, Jutta A. ; Salmenniemi, Suvi T. ; Vuolanto, Pia. / Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe : Health-related and sociodemographic determinants . Julkaisussa: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2018 ; Vuosikerta 46, Nro 4. Sivut 448-455.
@article{78764652c330465081a78365c83756ff,
title = "Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe: Health-related and sociodemographic determinants",
abstract = "Aims: The aim of this research was to study health-related and sociodemographic determinants of the use of different complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments in Europe and differences in CAM use in various European countries. Methods: The study was based on a design-based logistic regression analysis of the European Social Survey (ESS), Round 7. We distinguished four CAM modalities: manual therapies, alternative medicinal systems, traditional Asian medical systems and mind-body therapies. Results: In total, 25.9{\%} of the general population had used CAM during the last 12 months. Typically, only one CAM treatment had been used, and it was used more often as complementary rather than alternative treatment. The use of CAM varied greatly by country, from 10{\%} in Hungary to almost 40{\%} in Germany. Compared to those in good health, the use of CAM was two to fourfold greater among those with health problems. The health profiles of users of different CAM modalities varied. For example, back or neck pain was associated with all types of CAM, whereas depression was associated only with the use of mind-body therapies. Individuals with difficult to diagnose health conditions were more inclined to utilize CAM, and CAM use was more common among women and those with a higher education. Lower income was associated with the use of mind-body therapies, whereas the other three CAM modalities were associated with higher income. Conclusions: Help-seeking differed according to the health problem, something that should be acknowledged by clinical professionals to ensure safe care. The findings also point towards possible socioeconomic inequalities in health service use.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), health conditions, health problems, health services, help-seeking, determinants of CAM use, European Social Survey, country-level differences",
author = "Kemppainen, {Laura M.} and Kemppainen, {Teemu T.} and Reippainen, {Jutta A.} and Salmenniemi, {Suvi T.} and Pia Vuolanto",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1403494817733869",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "448--455",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1403-4948",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "4",

}

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe : Health-related and sociodemographic determinants . / Kemppainen, Laura M.; Kemppainen, Teemu T.; Reippainen, Jutta A.; Salmenniemi, Suvi T.; Vuolanto, Pia.

julkaisussa: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vuosikerta 46, Nro 4, 01.06.2018, s. 448-455.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe

T2 - Health-related and sociodemographic determinants

AU - Kemppainen, Laura M.

AU - Kemppainen, Teemu T.

AU - Reippainen, Jutta A.

AU - Salmenniemi, Suvi T.

AU - Vuolanto, Pia

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Aims: The aim of this research was to study health-related and sociodemographic determinants of the use of different complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments in Europe and differences in CAM use in various European countries. Methods: The study was based on a design-based logistic regression analysis of the European Social Survey (ESS), Round 7. We distinguished four CAM modalities: manual therapies, alternative medicinal systems, traditional Asian medical systems and mind-body therapies. Results: In total, 25.9% of the general population had used CAM during the last 12 months. Typically, only one CAM treatment had been used, and it was used more often as complementary rather than alternative treatment. The use of CAM varied greatly by country, from 10% in Hungary to almost 40% in Germany. Compared to those in good health, the use of CAM was two to fourfold greater among those with health problems. The health profiles of users of different CAM modalities varied. For example, back or neck pain was associated with all types of CAM, whereas depression was associated only with the use of mind-body therapies. Individuals with difficult to diagnose health conditions were more inclined to utilize CAM, and CAM use was more common among women and those with a higher education. Lower income was associated with the use of mind-body therapies, whereas the other three CAM modalities were associated with higher income. Conclusions: Help-seeking differed according to the health problem, something that should be acknowledged by clinical professionals to ensure safe care. The findings also point towards possible socioeconomic inequalities in health service use.

AB - Aims: The aim of this research was to study health-related and sociodemographic determinants of the use of different complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments in Europe and differences in CAM use in various European countries. Methods: The study was based on a design-based logistic regression analysis of the European Social Survey (ESS), Round 7. We distinguished four CAM modalities: manual therapies, alternative medicinal systems, traditional Asian medical systems and mind-body therapies. Results: In total, 25.9% of the general population had used CAM during the last 12 months. Typically, only one CAM treatment had been used, and it was used more often as complementary rather than alternative treatment. The use of CAM varied greatly by country, from 10% in Hungary to almost 40% in Germany. Compared to those in good health, the use of CAM was two to fourfold greater among those with health problems. The health profiles of users of different CAM modalities varied. For example, back or neck pain was associated with all types of CAM, whereas depression was associated only with the use of mind-body therapies. Individuals with difficult to diagnose health conditions were more inclined to utilize CAM, and CAM use was more common among women and those with a higher education. Lower income was associated with the use of mind-body therapies, whereas the other three CAM modalities were associated with higher income. Conclusions: Help-seeking differed according to the health problem, something that should be acknowledged by clinical professionals to ensure safe care. The findings also point towards possible socioeconomic inequalities in health service use.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)

KW - health conditions

KW - health problems

KW - health services

KW - help-seeking

KW - determinants of CAM use

KW - European Social Survey

KW - country-level differences

U2 - 10.1177/1403494817733869

DO - 10.1177/1403494817733869

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 448

EP - 455

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

SN - 1403-4948

IS - 4

ER -