What Is Analysis?: Between Theory, Ethnography, and Method

Martin Holbraad; Sarah Green; Alberto Corsín Jiménez; Veena Das; Nurit Bird-David; Eduardo Kohn; Ghassan Hage; Hannah Bear; Bruce Kapferer

doi:10.3167/sa.2018.620103

What Is Analysis? Between Theory, Ethnography, and Method

Martin Holbraad, Sarah Green, Alberto Corsín Jiménez, Veena Das, Nurit Bird-David, Eduardo Kohn, Ghassan Hage, Hannah Bear, Bruce Kapferer

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkelijulkaisu › Pääkirjoitus › Tieteellinen

Abstrakti

Recent years in anthropology have seen a noticeable trend, moving from debates about theory to a concern with method. So while some generations ago we would tend to identify ourselves as anthropologists with reference to particular theoretical paradigms—for example, Marxism, (post-)structuralism, cognitivism, cultural materialism, interpretivism—these days our tendency is to align ourselves, often eclectically, with proposals conceived as methodological: entanglements, assemblages, ontologies, technologies of description, epistemic partnerships, problematizations, collaborative anthropology, the art of noticing, and so on.

Alkuperäiskieli	englanti
Artikkeli	2
Lehti	Social Analysis
Vuosikerta	62
Numero	1
Sivut	1-30
Sivumäärä	30
ISSN	0155-977X
DOI - pysyväislinkit	https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2018.620103
Tila	Julkaistu - 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppi	B1 Kirjoitus tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Tieteenalat

5143 Sosiaali- ja kulttuuriantropologia

Pääsy asiakirjaan

10.3167/sa.2018.620103Lisenssi: Määrittelemätön

Crosslocations in the Mediterranean:rethinking the socio-cultural dynamics of relative positioning
Green, S.
01/09/2016 → 31/08/2021
Projekti: Tutkimusprojekti

Siteeraa tätä

@article{8a05bf07e1044fe6bd5d446aa75e8a09,

title = "What Is Analysis?: Between Theory, Ethnography, and Method",

abstract = "Recent years in anthropology have seen a noticeable trend, moving from debates about theory to a concern with method. So while some generations ago we would tend to identify ourselves as anthropologists with reference to particular theoretical paradigms—for example, Marxism, (post-)structuralism, cognitivism, cultural materialism, interpretivism—these days our tendency is to align ourselves, often eclectically, with proposals conceived as methodological: entanglements, assemblages, ontologies, technologies of description, epistemic partnerships, problematizations, collaborative anthropology, the art of noticing, and so on.",

keywords = "5143 Social and cultural anthropology, Analysis",

author = "Martin Holbraad and Sarah Green and {Cors{\'i}n Jim{\'e}nez}, Alberto and Veena Das and Nurit Bird-David and Eduardo Kohn and Ghassan Hage and Hannah Bear and Bruce Kapferer",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.3167/sa.2018.620103",

language = "English",

volume = "62",

pages = "1--30",

journal = "Social Analysis",

issn = "0155-977X",

publisher = "Berghahn Books",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Is Analysis?

T2 - Between Theory, Ethnography, and Method

AU - Holbraad, Martin

AU - Green, Sarah

AU - Corsín Jiménez, Alberto

AU - Das, Veena

AU - Bird-David, Nurit

AU - Kohn, Eduardo

AU - Hage, Ghassan

AU - Bear, Hannah

AU - Kapferer, Bruce

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Recent years in anthropology have seen a noticeable trend, moving from debates about theory to a concern with method. So while some generations ago we would tend to identify ourselves as anthropologists with reference to particular theoretical paradigms—for example, Marxism, (post-)structuralism, cognitivism, cultural materialism, interpretivism—these days our tendency is to align ourselves, often eclectically, with proposals conceived as methodological: entanglements, assemblages, ontologies, technologies of description, epistemic partnerships, problematizations, collaborative anthropology, the art of noticing, and so on.

AB - Recent years in anthropology have seen a noticeable trend, moving from debates about theory to a concern with method. So while some generations ago we would tend to identify ourselves as anthropologists with reference to particular theoretical paradigms—for example, Marxism, (post-)structuralism, cognitivism, cultural materialism, interpretivism—these days our tendency is to align ourselves, often eclectically, with proposals conceived as methodological: entanglements, assemblages, ontologies, technologies of description, epistemic partnerships, problematizations, collaborative anthropology, the art of noticing, and so on.

KW - 5143 Social and cultural anthropology

KW - Analysis

U2 - 10.3167/sa.2018.620103

DO - 10.3167/sa.2018.620103

M3 - Editorial

VL - 62

SP - 1

EP - 30

JO - Social Analysis

JF - Social Analysis

SN - 0155-977X

IS - 1

M1 - 2

ER -

What Is Analysis? Between Theory, Ethnography, and Method

Abstrakti

Tieteenalat

Pääsy asiakirjaan

Projektit

Crosslocations in the Mediterranean:rethinking the socio-cultural dynamics of relative positioning

Siteeraa tätä