Where is the epistemic community? On democratisation of science and social accounts of objectivity

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

This article focuses on epistemic challenges related to the democratisation of scientific knowledge production, and to the limitations of current social accounts of objectivity. A process of ’democratisation’ can be observed in many scientific and academic fields today. Collaboration with extra-academic agents and the use of extra-academic expertise and knowledge has become common, and researchers are interested in promoting socially inclusive research practices. As this development is particularly prevalent in policy-relevant research, it is important that the new, more democratic forms of research be objective. In social accounts of objectivity only epistemic communities are taken to be able to produce objective knowledge, or the entity whose objectivity is to be assessed is precisely such a community. As I argue, these accounts do not allow for situations where it is not easy to identify the relevant epistemic community. Democratisation of scientific knowledge production can lead to such situations. As an example, I discuss attempts to link indigenous oral traditions to floods and tsunamis that happened hundreds or even thousands of years ago.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiSynthese
Vuosikerta194
Numero12
Sivut4671–4686
Sivumäärä16
ISSN0039-7857
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2017
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 611 Filosofia

Lainaa tätä

@article{970f033bdcca406b839edc53306acb3f,
title = "Where is the epistemic community?: On democratisation of science and social accounts of objectivity",
abstract = "This article focuses on epistemic challenges related to the democratisation of scientific knowledge production, and to the limitations of current social accounts of objectivity. A process of ’democratisation’ can be observed in many scientific and academic fields today. Collaboration with extra-academic agents and the use of extra-academic expertise and knowledge has become common, and researchers are interested in promoting socially inclusive research practices. As this development is particularly prevalent in policy-relevant research, it is important that the new, more democratic forms of research be objective. In social accounts of objectivity only epistemic communities are taken to be able to produce objective knowledge, or the entity whose objectivity is to be assessed is precisely such a community. As I argue, these accounts do not allow for situations where it is not easy to identify the relevant epistemic community. Democratisation of scientific knowledge production can lead to such situations. As an example, I discuss attempts to link indigenous oral traditions to floods and tsunamis that happened hundreds or even thousands of years ago.",
keywords = "611 Philosophy, social epistemology, objectivity, science and values, research communities, research teams, participatory research, transdisciplinarity, democratisation of science, indigenous knowledge",
author = "Inkeri Koskinen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-016-1173-2",
language = "English",
volume = "194",
pages = "4671–4686",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "12",

}

Where is the epistemic community? On democratisation of science and social accounts of objectivity. / Koskinen, Inkeri.

julkaisussa: Synthese, Vuosikerta 194, Nro 12, 2017, s. 4671–4686.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where is the epistemic community?

T2 - On democratisation of science and social accounts of objectivity

AU - Koskinen, Inkeri

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article focuses on epistemic challenges related to the democratisation of scientific knowledge production, and to the limitations of current social accounts of objectivity. A process of ’democratisation’ can be observed in many scientific and academic fields today. Collaboration with extra-academic agents and the use of extra-academic expertise and knowledge has become common, and researchers are interested in promoting socially inclusive research practices. As this development is particularly prevalent in policy-relevant research, it is important that the new, more democratic forms of research be objective. In social accounts of objectivity only epistemic communities are taken to be able to produce objective knowledge, or the entity whose objectivity is to be assessed is precisely such a community. As I argue, these accounts do not allow for situations where it is not easy to identify the relevant epistemic community. Democratisation of scientific knowledge production can lead to such situations. As an example, I discuss attempts to link indigenous oral traditions to floods and tsunamis that happened hundreds or even thousands of years ago.

AB - This article focuses on epistemic challenges related to the democratisation of scientific knowledge production, and to the limitations of current social accounts of objectivity. A process of ’democratisation’ can be observed in many scientific and academic fields today. Collaboration with extra-academic agents and the use of extra-academic expertise and knowledge has become common, and researchers are interested in promoting socially inclusive research practices. As this development is particularly prevalent in policy-relevant research, it is important that the new, more democratic forms of research be objective. In social accounts of objectivity only epistemic communities are taken to be able to produce objective knowledge, or the entity whose objectivity is to be assessed is precisely such a community. As I argue, these accounts do not allow for situations where it is not easy to identify the relevant epistemic community. Democratisation of scientific knowledge production can lead to such situations. As an example, I discuss attempts to link indigenous oral traditions to floods and tsunamis that happened hundreds or even thousands of years ago.

KW - 611 Philosophy

KW - social epistemology

KW - objectivity

KW - science and values

KW - research communities

KW - research teams

KW - participatory research

KW - transdisciplinarity

KW - democratisation of science

KW - indigenous knowledge

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-016-1173-2

DO - 10.1007/s11229-016-1173-2

M3 - Article

VL - 194

SP - 4671

EP - 4686

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 12

ER -