Agentic and communal bias in socially desirable responding

    Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

    Sammanfattning

    "This research was designed to investigate Paulhus' communion management (CM) and self-deceptive enhancement (SDE), socially desirable responding (SDR) scales as measures of general SDR, communal bias and agentic bias. The CM and SDE scales, as well as the Schwartz values survey (SVS), were administered to four samples drawn from different cultures and subcultures (N = 900). Participants completed the questionnaires in 'honest' and fake good' conditions. Although conceptions of which values were desirable varied strongly between samples and instructional sets, the CM scale was consistently related to general SDR and to communal bias. In contrast, the SDE scale was only related to general SDR. Contrary to expectations, neither scale could identify participants who faked good' under normal instructions. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."
    Originalspråkengelska
    TidskriftEuropean Journal of Personality
    Volym21
    Utgåva6
    Sidor (från-till)853-868
    Antal sidor16
    ISSN0890-2070
    DOI
    StatusPublicerad - 2007
    MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad

    Vetenskapsgrenar

    • 515 Psykologi
    • käyttäytyminen
    • hyväksyttävyys

    Citera det här

    @article{7e7660dc167240249c7342e64dc1b7b7,
    title = "Agentic and communal bias in socially desirable responding",
    abstract = "{"}This research was designed to investigate Paulhus' communion management (CM) and self-deceptive enhancement (SDE), socially desirable responding (SDR) scales as measures of general SDR, communal bias and agentic bias. The CM and SDE scales, as well as the Schwartz values survey (SVS), were administered to four samples drawn from different cultures and subcultures (N = 900). Participants completed the questionnaires in 'honest' and fake good' conditions. Although conceptions of which values were desirable varied strongly between samples and instructional sets, the CM scale was consistently related to general SDR and to communal bias. In contrast, the SDE scale was only related to general SDR. Contrary to expectations, neither scale could identify participants who faked good' under normal instructions. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.{"}",
    keywords = "515 Psychology, k{\"a}ytt{\"a}ytyminen, hyv{\"a}ksytt{\"a}vyys, k{\"a}ytt{\"a}ytyminen, hyv{\"a}ksytt{\"a}vyys, k{\"a}ytt{\"a}ytyminen, hyv{\"a}ksytt{\"a}vyys",
    author = "Jan-Erik L{\"o}nnqvist and Markku Verkasalo and Irina Bezmenova",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1002/per.639",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "853--868",
    journal = "European Journal of Personality",
    issn = "0890-2070",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "6",

    }

    Agentic and communal bias in socially desirable responding. / Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik; Verkasalo, Markku; Bezmenova, Irina.

    I: European Journal of Personality, Vol. 21, Nr. 6, 2007, s. 853-868.

    Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Agentic and communal bias in socially desirable responding

    AU - Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik

    AU - Verkasalo, Markku

    AU - Bezmenova, Irina

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - "This research was designed to investigate Paulhus' communion management (CM) and self-deceptive enhancement (SDE), socially desirable responding (SDR) scales as measures of general SDR, communal bias and agentic bias. The CM and SDE scales, as well as the Schwartz values survey (SVS), were administered to four samples drawn from different cultures and subcultures (N = 900). Participants completed the questionnaires in 'honest' and fake good' conditions. Although conceptions of which values were desirable varied strongly between samples and instructional sets, the CM scale was consistently related to general SDR and to communal bias. In contrast, the SDE scale was only related to general SDR. Contrary to expectations, neither scale could identify participants who faked good' under normal instructions. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."

    AB - "This research was designed to investigate Paulhus' communion management (CM) and self-deceptive enhancement (SDE), socially desirable responding (SDR) scales as measures of general SDR, communal bias and agentic bias. The CM and SDE scales, as well as the Schwartz values survey (SVS), were administered to four samples drawn from different cultures and subcultures (N = 900). Participants completed the questionnaires in 'honest' and fake good' conditions. Although conceptions of which values were desirable varied strongly between samples and instructional sets, the CM scale was consistently related to general SDR and to communal bias. In contrast, the SDE scale was only related to general SDR. Contrary to expectations, neither scale could identify participants who faked good' under normal instructions. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."

    KW - 515 Psychology

    KW - käyttäytyminen

    KW - hyväksyttävyys

    KW - käyttäytyminen

    KW - hyväksyttävyys

    KW - käyttäytyminen

    KW - hyväksyttävyys

    U2 - 10.1002/per.639

    DO - 10.1002/per.639

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 853

    EP - 868

    JO - European Journal of Personality

    JF - European Journal of Personality

    SN - 0890-2070

    IS - 6

    ER -