Sammanfattning
Hop count limitation helps controlling the spread
of messages as well as the protocol complexity and overhead
in a distributed network. For a mobile opportunistic network,
we examine how the paths between any two nodes change with
increasing number of hops a message can follow. Using the all
hops optimal path (AHOP) problem, we represent the total delay
of a route from a source node to a destination node as additive
weight and use the number of encounters as a representation
of bottleneck weight. First, we construct a static (contact) graph
from the meetings recorded in a human contact trace and then
analyze the change in these two weights with increasing hop
count. Alternatively, we aggregate all the contact events in a
time interval and construct several time-aggregated graphs over
which we calculate the capacity metrics. Although, we observe
differences in the properties of the static and the time-aggregated
graphs (e.g., higher connectivity and average degree in static
graph), our analysis shows that second hop brings most of the
benefits of multi-hop routing for the studied networks. However,
the optimal paths —path that provides the most desirable
bottleneck/additive weight— are achieved at further hops, e.g,
hop count ≈ 4. Our finding, which is also verified by simulations,
is paramount as it puts an upper bound on the hop count for
the hop-limited routing schemes by discovering the optimal hop
count for both additive and bottleneck weights.
of messages as well as the protocol complexity and overhead
in a distributed network. For a mobile opportunistic network,
we examine how the paths between any two nodes change with
increasing number of hops a message can follow. Using the all
hops optimal path (AHOP) problem, we represent the total delay
of a route from a source node to a destination node as additive
weight and use the number of encounters as a representation
of bottleneck weight. First, we construct a static (contact) graph
from the meetings recorded in a human contact trace and then
analyze the change in these two weights with increasing hop
count. Alternatively, we aggregate all the contact events in a
time interval and construct several time-aggregated graphs over
which we calculate the capacity metrics. Although, we observe
differences in the properties of the static and the time-aggregated
graphs (e.g., higher connectivity and average degree in static
graph), our analysis shows that second hop brings most of the
benefits of multi-hop routing for the studied networks. However,
the optimal paths —path that provides the most desirable
bottleneck/additive weight— are achieved at further hops, e.g,
hop count ≈ 4. Our finding, which is also verified by simulations,
is paramount as it puts an upper bound on the hop count for
the hop-limited routing schemes by discovering the optimal hop
count for both additive and bottleneck weights.
Originalspråk | engelska |
---|---|
Titel på gästpublikation | 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) |
Antal sidor | 6 |
Utgivningsort | Piscataway, NJ |
Förlag | IEEE |
Utgivningsdatum | jun 2015 |
Sidor | 3287-3292 |
ISBN (tryckt) | 978-1-4673-6432-4 |
DOI | |
Status | Publicerad - jun 2015 |
MoE-publikationstyp | A4 Artikel i en konferenspublikation |
Evenemang | IEEE International Conference on Communications - London, Storbritannien Varaktighet: 8 jun 2015 → 12 jun 2015 Konferensnummer: 2015 (ICC) |
Publikationsserier
Namn | IEEE International Conference on Communications |
---|---|
Förlag | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
ISSN (tryckt) | 1550-3607 |
Vetenskapsgrenar
- 113 Data- och informationsvetenskap