Analysis of Students' Peer Reviews to Crowdsourced Programming Assignments

Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/konferenshandlingKonferensbidragVetenskapligPeer review


We have used a tool called CrowdSorcerer that allows students to create programming assignments. The students are given a topic by a teacher, after which the students design a programming assignment: the assignment description, the code template, a model solution and a set of input-output -tests. The created assignments are peer reviewed by other students on the course. We study students' peer reviews to these student-generated assignments, focusing on examining the differences between novice and experienced programmers. We then analyze whether the exercises created by experienced programmers are rated better quality-wise than those created by novices. Additionally, we investigate the differences between novices and experienced programmers as peer reviewers: can novices review assignments as well as experienced programmers?
Titel på gästpublikationProceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
Utgivningsdatum22 nov 2018
ISBN (elektroniskt)978-1-4503-6535-2
StatusPublicerad - 22 nov 2018
MoE-publikationstypA4 Artikel i en konferenspublikation
Evenemang18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research - Koli National Park, Lieksa, Finland
Varaktighet: 22 nov 201825 nov 2018


  • 113 Data- och informationsvetenskap

Citera det här