Analysis of Students' Peer Reviews to Crowdsourced Programming Assignments

Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/konferenshandlingKonferensbidragVetenskapligPeer review

Sammanfattning

We have used a tool called CrowdSorcerer that allows students to create programming assignments. The students are given a topic by a teacher, after which the students design a programming assignment: the assignment description, the code template, a model solution and a set of input-output -tests. The created assignments are peer reviewed by other students on the course. We study students' peer reviews to these student-generated assignments, focusing on examining the differences between novice and experienced programmers. We then analyze whether the exercises created by experienced programmers are rated better quality-wise than those created by novices. Additionally, we investigate the differences between novices and experienced programmers as peer reviewers: can novices review assignments as well as experienced programmers?
Originalspråkengelska
Titel på gästpublikationProceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
FörlagACM
Utgivningsdatum22 nov 2018
Artikelnummer21
ISBN (elektroniskt)978-1-4503-6535-2
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 22 nov 2018
MoE-publikationstypA4 Artikel i en konferenspublikation
Evenemang18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research - Koli National Park, Lieksa, Finland
Varaktighet: 22 nov 201825 nov 2018

Vetenskapsgrenar

  • 113 Data- och informationsvetenskap

Citera det här