We have used a tool called CrowdSorcerer that allows students to create programming assignments. The students are given a topic by a teacher, after which the students design a programming assignment: the assignment description, the code template, a model solution and a set of input-output -tests. The created assignments are peer reviewed by other students on the course. We study students' peer reviews to these student-generated assignments, focusing on examining the differences between novice and experienced programmers. We then analyze whether the exercises created by experienced programmers are rated better quality-wise than those created by novices. Additionally, we investigate the differences between novices and experienced programmers as peer reviewers: can novices review assignments as well as experienced programmers?
|Titel på gästpublikation||Proceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research|
|Utgivningsdatum||22 nov 2018|
|Status||Publicerad - 22 nov 2018|
|MoE-publikationstyp||A4 Artikel i en konferenspublikation|
|Evenemang||18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research - Koli National Park, Lieksa, Finland|
Varaktighet: 22 nov 2018 → 25 nov 2018
- 113 Data- och informationsvetenskap