Attitudes and public punishment preferences: Finnish results of Scandinavian sense of justice research

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

Sammanfattning

Opinion polls have repeatedly shown that populations favour severe penalties for offenders. However, surveys using a case vignette method, where the attributes of the case described to the respondents are varied, produce more versatile results. Such research gives a nuanced picture of punitive attitudes. In this study, the sentence decisions of laypeople who are informed about the offender’s criminal history, ethnic background, gender, social issues and substance abuse were examined.

A representative mail survey collected in Finland as part of Scandinavian sense of justice research was used as empirical data. Respondents were presented with six criminal cases and asked to determine sentences for them. All respondents received the same vignettes, but the background attributes of the offenders varied randomly.

This study showed that all the background attributes had a clear connection to the sentence decisions. Considering these results, the idea of a ‘general punitive attitude’, which is commonly used in academic literature, appears to be too simple of a way to look at the relationship between attitudes and punishment decisions.
Originalspråkengelska
TidskriftJournal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention
Volym19
Utgåva2
Sidor (från-till)152-169
Antal sidor18
ISSN1404-3858
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 3 aug 2018
MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad

Vetenskapsgrenar

  • 5141 Sociologi

Citera det här