Does public criticism erode trust in the police? The case of Jari Aarnio in the Finnish news media and its effects on the public’s attitudes towards the police

Juha Tapio Kääriäinen, Pekka Isotalus, Thomassen Gunnar

    Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

    Sammanfattning

    A significant part of the general public’s observations and image
    concerning the police comes through the mass media. It has been
    assumed that one factor affecting the level of trust is the way the
    media handles the police. This article describes the media uproar
    that arose in Finland in November 2013 about police misconduct,
    and its effects on the public trust in the police. Two hypotheses
    were tested in the study: (a) negative publicity always decreases
    trust, and so, too, in this case; and (b) a change in trust is affected
    by the public’s independent interpretation of the publicity battle, in
    which case criticism might also increase trust. The study materials
    comprise the news coverage concerning the uproar and four opinion
    surveys collected after it occurred. The first survey was conducted
    immediately after the press conference of the case in week 48/2013
    and the other ones in three-week intervals. The results show that
    following the uproar, compared to the earlier results of the European
    Social Survey, trust in the police did not decrease—on the contrary, it
    increased slightly. Our results suggest that in this case a large part of
    the audience has taken, to use the term of Stuart Hall, the oppositional
    position when interpreting negative news about the police.
    Originalspråkengelska
    TidskriftJournal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention
    Volym17
    Utgåva1
    Sidor (från-till)70-85
    Antal sidor16
    ISSN1404-3858
    DOI
    StatusPublicerad - 2016
    MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad

    Vetenskapsgrenar

    • 513 Juridik
    • 5141 Sociologi

    Citera det här