TY - JOUR
T1 - Forum on Heikki Patomäki's World Statehood
T2 - The Future of World Politics
AU - Albert, Mathias
AU - Crawford, Ian
AU - Erman, Eva
AU - Kessler, O
AU - Bartelson, Jens
AU - Sienknecht, Mitja
AU - Patomäki, H
PY - 2024/7/26
Y1 - 2024/7/26
N2 - In this forum, six scholars discuss Heikki Patom & auml;ki's book World Statehood: The Future of World Politics, published in 2023. The editor's introduction situates it in the discursive contexts of cosmopolitanism, deep history and functional differentiation. Ian Crawford looks at the concept of world statehood from an astrobiologist's point of view, putting the debate in the context of research on the possibility of life existing beyond Earth. Eva Erman notes that there are methodological issues that primarily derive from a missing distinction between theoretical and practical normativity in Patom & auml;ki's thought. Oliver Kessler offers a critical perspective on underlying, and possibly unrealistic, assumptions about a universal translatability of specialized knowledges and vocabularies that he argues underlines Patom & auml;ki's project. Jens Bartelson argues that the concept of world community has probably accumulated too much conceptual baggage to be useful in building world statehood. Mitja Sienknecht observes that the evolution of artificial intelligence is insufficiently addressed in World Statehood and probes possible implications in this respect. Heikki Patom & auml;ki then replies to these contributions.
AB - In this forum, six scholars discuss Heikki Patom & auml;ki's book World Statehood: The Future of World Politics, published in 2023. The editor's introduction situates it in the discursive contexts of cosmopolitanism, deep history and functional differentiation. Ian Crawford looks at the concept of world statehood from an astrobiologist's point of view, putting the debate in the context of research on the possibility of life existing beyond Earth. Eva Erman notes that there are methodological issues that primarily derive from a missing distinction between theoretical and practical normativity in Patom & auml;ki's thought. Oliver Kessler offers a critical perspective on underlying, and possibly unrealistic, assumptions about a universal translatability of specialized knowledges and vocabularies that he argues underlines Patom & auml;ki's project. Jens Bartelson argues that the concept of world community has probably accumulated too much conceptual baggage to be useful in building world statehood. Mitja Sienknecht observes that the evolution of artificial intelligence is insufficiently addressed in World Statehood and probes possible implications in this respect. Heikki Patom & auml;ki then replies to these contributions.
KW - Cosmopolitanism
KW - Global political economy
KW - World community
KW - World statehood
KW - 5171 Political Science
U2 - 10.1177/00108367241261483
DO - 10.1177/00108367241261483
M3 - Article
SN - 0010-8367
JO - Cooperation and Conflict
JF - Cooperation and Conflict
ER -