Governing a just future – what and how to govern? Commentary to Jones

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragKommentar/debattVetenskaplig

Sammanfattning

In dealing with the topic of “governing the future”, it is fundamental to understand how different practices define justice in content as well as in processual sense. Premises of justification can be seen as essential indicators of the future direction of societal decision-making in governance networks, as well as in determining whose realities play a part when defining future imaginaries. We are dealing with a complex entity and we need to ask whether a future as such can be distinguished from how it is produced in different governing practices? I would also like to emphasize that the concept of ‘governance’ needs to be taken under careful scrutiny. Governance has not replaced government, as most often both of these management logics are present simultaneously. This is creating tensions within the public sector. My comments to the issues presented in Rhys Jones’ article are grounded in planning theory and my ongoing research concerning justification of new spatial planning practices in the Nordic countries.
Originalspråkengelska
TidskriftFennia : International Journal of Geography
Volym197
Utgåva1
Sidor (från-till)137-140
ISSN1798-5617
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 2019
MoE-publikationstypB1 Artikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift

Vetenskapsgrenar

  • 1171 Geovetenskaper

Citera det här

@article{85caa11cf07f49748b4f5a5e35833b7b,
title = "Governing a just future – what and how to govern? Commentary to Jones",
abstract = "In dealing with the topic of “governing the future”, it is fundamental to understand how different practices define justice in content as well as in processual sense. Premises of justification can be seen as essential indicators of the future direction of societal decision-making in governance networks, as well as in determining whose realities play a part when defining future imaginaries. We are dealing with a complex entity and we need to ask whether a future as such can be distinguished from how it is produced in different governing practices? I would also like to emphasize that the concept of ‘governance’ needs to be taken under careful scrutiny. Governance has not replaced government, as most often both of these management logics are present simultaneously. This is creating tensions within the public sector. My comments to the issues presented in Rhys Jones’ article are grounded in planning theory and my ongoing research concerning justification of new spatial planning practices in the Nordic countries.",
keywords = "1171 Geosciences",
author = "B{\"a}cklund, {Satu Pia Marianne}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.11143/fennia.80208",
language = "English",
volume = "197",
pages = "137--140",
journal = "Fennia : International Journal of Geography",
issn = "1798-5617",
publisher = "Geographical Society of Finland",
number = "1",

}

Governing a just future – what and how to govern? Commentary to Jones. / Bäcklund, Satu Pia Marianne.

I: Fennia : International Journal of Geography, Vol. 197, Nr. 1, 2019, s. 137-140.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragKommentar/debattVetenskaplig

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing a just future – what and how to govern? Commentary to Jones

AU - Bäcklund, Satu Pia Marianne

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In dealing with the topic of “governing the future”, it is fundamental to understand how different practices define justice in content as well as in processual sense. Premises of justification can be seen as essential indicators of the future direction of societal decision-making in governance networks, as well as in determining whose realities play a part when defining future imaginaries. We are dealing with a complex entity and we need to ask whether a future as such can be distinguished from how it is produced in different governing practices? I would also like to emphasize that the concept of ‘governance’ needs to be taken under careful scrutiny. Governance has not replaced government, as most often both of these management logics are present simultaneously. This is creating tensions within the public sector. My comments to the issues presented in Rhys Jones’ article are grounded in planning theory and my ongoing research concerning justification of new spatial planning practices in the Nordic countries.

AB - In dealing with the topic of “governing the future”, it is fundamental to understand how different practices define justice in content as well as in processual sense. Premises of justification can be seen as essential indicators of the future direction of societal decision-making in governance networks, as well as in determining whose realities play a part when defining future imaginaries. We are dealing with a complex entity and we need to ask whether a future as such can be distinguished from how it is produced in different governing practices? I would also like to emphasize that the concept of ‘governance’ needs to be taken under careful scrutiny. Governance has not replaced government, as most often both of these management logics are present simultaneously. This is creating tensions within the public sector. My comments to the issues presented in Rhys Jones’ article are grounded in planning theory and my ongoing research concerning justification of new spatial planning practices in the Nordic countries.

KW - 1171 Geosciences

U2 - 10.11143/fennia.80208

DO - 10.11143/fennia.80208

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 197

SP - 137

EP - 140

JO - Fennia : International Journal of Geography

JF - Fennia : International Journal of Geography

SN - 1798-5617

IS - 1

ER -