TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)
AU - Klionsky, Daniel J.
AU - Anwar, Tahira
AU - Eskelinen, Eeva-Liisa
AU - Holmberg, Carina I
AU - Jokitalo, Eija
AU - Kaarniranta, Kai
AU - Kauppinen, Anu
AU - Khandelwal, Vinoth Kumar Megra
AU - Koskela, Ali
AU - McWilliams, Thomas G.
AU - Myöhänen, Timo
AU - Roux, Sophie
AU - Saksela, Kalle
AU - Sarparanta, Jaakko Joonatan
AU - Vihinen, Helena
N1 - More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
AB - In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
KW - 1182 Biochemistry, cell and molecular biology
KW - Autophagosome
KW - cancer
KW - flux
KW - LC3
KW - lysosome
KW - macroautophagy
KW - neurodegeneration
KW - phagophore
KW - stress
KW - vacuole
KW - CHAPERONE-MEDIATED AUTOPHAGY
KW - ACTIVATED PROTEIN-KINASE
KW - PROGRAMMED CELL-DEATH
KW - STARVATION-INDUCED AUTOPHAGY
KW - ENDOPLASMIC-RETICULUM STRESS
KW - NF-KAPPA-B
KW - BREAST-CANCER CELLS
KW - LIFE-SPAN EXTENSION
KW - AMYOTROPHIC-LATERAL-SCLEROSIS
KW - GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION
U2 - 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
DO - 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
M3 - Review Article
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 382
JO - Autophagy
JF - Autophagy
SN - 1554-8627
IS - 1
ER -