Haastattelumenetelmän tulkinnat sosiaalitieteellisessä diskurssintutkimuksessa: esimerkkinä laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

Sammanfattning

The debate over the role of interviews in qualitative social research, especially relational-constructionist forms of discursive research, was lively already a decade ago and the debate continues. Some scholars argue that researchers who are interested in discourses should avoid producing interview data altogether. In this article, we compile and critically discuss the criticism posed against interview-based discursive research and defend the place of interviews in social research. While evaluating different forms of research, we argue, one must discuss methods and materials but also, if not more importantly, theoretical and methodological perspectives to them. Furthermore, we introduce qualitative attitude approach as an example of a discursive approach that utilises interview data while acknowledging the criticism against interview-based research scholars have presented over the years.
Originalspråkfinska
TidskriftAFinLA-e Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia
Volym2018
Utgåva11
Sidor (från-till)93-113
Antal sidor21
ISSN1798-7822
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 2018
MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad

Vetenskapsgrenar

  • 5141 Sociologi
  • 5144 Socialpsykologi

Citera det här

@article{2e10694aa1d74314965453491884d079,
title = "Haastattelumenetelm{\"a}n tulkinnat sosiaalitieteellisess{\"a} diskurssintutkimuksessa: esimerkkin{\"a} laadullisen asennetutkimuksen l{\"a}hestymistapa",
abstract = "The debate over the role of interviews in qualitative social research, especially relational-constructionist forms of discursive research, was lively already a decade ago and the debate continues. Some scholars argue that researchers who are interested in discourses should avoid producing interview data altogether. In this article, we compile and critically discuss the criticism posed against interview-based discursive research and defend the place of interviews in social research. While evaluating different forms of research, we argue, one must discuss methods and materials but also, if not more importantly, theoretical and methodological perspectives to them. Furthermore, we introduce qualitative attitude approach as an example of a discursive approach that utilises interview data while acknowledging the criticism against interview-based research scholars have presented over the years.",
keywords = "5141 Sosiologia, diskurssitutkimuksen metodologia, laadullinen asennetutkimus, haastattelut, discursive methodology, qualitative attitude approach, INTERVIEWS, 5144 Sosiaalipsykologia",
author = "Miira Niska and Antero Olakivi and Vesala, {Kari Mikko}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.30660/afinla.69046",
language = "suomi",
volume = "2018",
pages = "93--113",
journal = "AFinLA-e Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia",
issn = "1798-7822",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Haastattelumenetelmän tulkinnat sosiaalitieteellisessä diskurssintutkimuksessa

T2 - esimerkkinä laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa

AU - Niska, Miira

AU - Olakivi, Antero

AU - Vesala, Kari Mikko

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The debate over the role of interviews in qualitative social research, especially relational-constructionist forms of discursive research, was lively already a decade ago and the debate continues. Some scholars argue that researchers who are interested in discourses should avoid producing interview data altogether. In this article, we compile and critically discuss the criticism posed against interview-based discursive research and defend the place of interviews in social research. While evaluating different forms of research, we argue, one must discuss methods and materials but also, if not more importantly, theoretical and methodological perspectives to them. Furthermore, we introduce qualitative attitude approach as an example of a discursive approach that utilises interview data while acknowledging the criticism against interview-based research scholars have presented over the years.

AB - The debate over the role of interviews in qualitative social research, especially relational-constructionist forms of discursive research, was lively already a decade ago and the debate continues. Some scholars argue that researchers who are interested in discourses should avoid producing interview data altogether. In this article, we compile and critically discuss the criticism posed against interview-based discursive research and defend the place of interviews in social research. While evaluating different forms of research, we argue, one must discuss methods and materials but also, if not more importantly, theoretical and methodological perspectives to them. Furthermore, we introduce qualitative attitude approach as an example of a discursive approach that utilises interview data while acknowledging the criticism against interview-based research scholars have presented over the years.

KW - 5141 Sosiologia

KW - diskurssitutkimuksen metodologia

KW - laadullinen asennetutkimus

KW - haastattelut

KW - discursive methodology

KW - qualitative attitude approach

KW - INTERVIEWS

KW - 5144 Sosiaalipsykologia

U2 - 10.30660/afinla.69046

DO - 10.30660/afinla.69046

M3 - Artikkeli

VL - 2018

SP - 93

EP - 113

JO - AFinLA-e Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia

JF - AFinLA-e Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia

SN - 1798-7822

IS - 11

ER -