Summary Objective Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the context of epilepsy surgery or extraoperative DCS in adults are, however, sparse, and validation of nTMS with DCS in children is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about the risk of inducing epileptic seizures with nTMS in pediatric epilepsy patients. We provide the largest validation study to date in an epilepsy surgery population. Methods We compared language mapping with nTMS and extraoperative DCS in 20 epilepsy surgery patients (age range 9‐32 years; 14 children and adolescents). Results In comparison with DCS, sensitivity of nTMS was 68 specificity 76 positive predictive value 27 and negative predictive value 95 Age, location of ictal‐onset zone near or within DCS‐mapped language areas or severity of cognitive deficits had no significant effect on these values. None of our patients had seizures during nTMS. Significance Our study suggests that nTMS language mapping is clinically useful and safe in epilepsy surgery patients, including school‐aged children and patients with extensive cognitive dysfunction. Similar to in tumor surgery, mapping results in the frontal region are most reliable. False negative findings may be slightly more likely in epilepsy than in tumor surgery patients. Mapping results should always be verified by other methods in individual patients.
- 3112 Neurovetenskaper
- 3126 Kirurgi, anestesiologi, intensivvård, radiologi
- 3124 Neurologi och psykiatri
- 515 Psykologi
- 6163 Logopedi
Citera det här
Lehtinen, H., Mäkelä, J. P., Mäkelä, T., Lioumis, P., Metsähonkala, L., Hokkanen, L., ... Gaily, E. (2018). Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation. Epilepsia Open, 3(2), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110