Truthlikeness: old and new debates

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review


The notion of truthlikeness or verisimilitude has been a topic of intensive discussion ever since the definition proposed by Karl Popper was refuted in 1974. This paper gives an analysis of old and new debates about this notion. There is a fairly large agreement about the truthlikeness ordering of conjunctive theories, but the main rival approaches differ especially about false disjunctive theories. Continuing the debate between Niiniluoto's min-sum measure and Schurz's relevant consequence measure, the paper also gives a critical assessment of Oddie's new defense of the average measure and Kuipers' refined definition of truth approximation.
Sidor (från-till)1-19
Antal sidor19
StatusPublicerad - 26 okt 2018
MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad


  • 611 Filosofi

Citera det här